guess the buildingMonday 31 Oct 05what which london building is this ? it’s a b-list in terms of buildings go, but is still quite imposing. Tags:buildings 9 thoughts on “guess the building” Vin Monday 31 Oct 05 at 09:51 At first I thought it was Senate House in Malet St, then the Shell Building at Waterloo, but now I give up. funkypancake Monday 31 Oct 05 at 09:53 one of those answers is correct. which one are you going for ? Vin Monday 31 Oct 05 at 10:00 I’m going for Shell. funkypancake Monday 31 Oct 05 at 10:02 correct ! i’ll put up a big picture tomorrow. Vin Monday 31 Oct 05 at 10:07 A big picture? That’s my prize?! funkypancake Monday 31 Oct 05 at 10:10 and a whole pile of respect from fellow readers. what more do you want 😉 Vin Monday 31 Oct 05 at 10:20 I’ll settle for that ¦:¬) Vin Monday 31 Oct 05 at 10:22 It didn’t come out like that in the preview! ¦:¬) funkypancake Monday 31 Oct 05 at 10:25 how very strange. you’ve obviously discovered some secret escape code. probably best not to use do |: again. Comments are closed. previouswalter looking sidewaysnextdancing bear foot
Vin Monday 31 Oct 05 at 09:51 At first I thought it was Senate House in Malet St, then the Shell Building at Waterloo, but now I give up.
funkypancake Monday 31 Oct 05 at 09:53 one of those answers is correct. which one are you going for ?
funkypancake Monday 31 Oct 05 at 10:10 and a whole pile of respect from fellow readers. what more do you want 😉
funkypancake Monday 31 Oct 05 at 10:25 how very strange. you’ve obviously discovered some secret escape code. probably best not to use do |: again.
At first I thought it was Senate House in Malet St, then the Shell Building at Waterloo, but now I give up.
one of those answers is correct. which one are you going for ?
I’m going for Shell.
correct !
i’ll put up a big picture tomorrow.
A big picture? That’s my prize?!
and a whole pile of respect from fellow readers.
what more do you want 😉
I’ll settle for that ¦:¬)
It didn’t come out like that in the preview! ¦:¬)
how very strange. you’ve obviously discovered some secret escape code.
probably best not to use do |: again.
Comments are closed.